Our latest impressions and news
In Malawi the agricultural sector drives the economy accounting for about 29 percent of GDP (CIA World factbook, 2018) and provides nearly 80% of employment (FAO 2015). Agricultural lands in Malawi make up roughly 47% of the total land area (FAO, 2013). Yet, food insecurity in Malawi remains widespread, especially among the rural poor. The 2016/17 production year saw about 6.7 million people, about half of Malawi’s rural population, being food insecure (need reference).
The agricultural sector is characterized by a dualistic structure – a high input/high productivity estate sector and a low input/low productivity smallholder sector. The estate sector comprises a small number of large-scale farmers, occupying about 60 percent of the fertile land. The smallholder sub-sector comprises a very large number of farmers growing mainly low-yield food crops on small plots with a minimal use of inputs (Moyo et al. 2015). 55 percent of the smallholder farmers farm on less than 0.5 ha and more than 75 percent cultivate less than one ha of land (NSO 2005; DARS 2011). Smallholder agriculture generally accounts for more than 85% of production which meets the country’s demand for food staples and provides some export surplus (NSO 2004; DARS 2011). This is because estate farmers focus heavily on export crops.
The agricultural sector in Malawi is faced with many challenges. Over reliance on rainfall which is usually of a short duration renders the country vulnerably to weather shocks and hazards. Erratic rainfall, increased water scarcity, rising temperatures, and extreme weather events such as floods and droughts have increased in magnitude and frequency over the years (Coulibaly et al. 2015). In addition, the country is also affected by deforestation and land degradation. Yaron et al. (2011) showed that soil losses through erosion averaged 20 t/ha/year, which translated to a yield loss of 4 – 25% every year. This undermines the livelihoods of rural communities and exacerbates the extent of food insecurity and rural poverty in Malawi.
The country’s main food crops are maize, groundnuts, cassava, sweet potatoes, beans, soybeans pigeonpeas, rice, sorghum, millets, vegetables and fruits. There is low adoption of sustainable agricultural technologies as the majority of farmers still practice traditional farming methods.<.p>
This coupled with low capacity of households to bounce back when hit by shock, leaves households vulnerable to food insecurity in times of shocks such as price fluctuation and weather variations (IMF 2017). Low investments in soil fertility improvement and increasing climate variability over the last five decades has further compounded the problem, leaving the sector increasingly vulnerable (Binswanger-Mkhize et al., 2011). For example, more than 90% of maize is produced under rainfed conditions often with erratic rains featuring as the most important production factor (Kamanga et al., 2015). In addition, most soils have lost their inherent fertility and do not produce a good crop yield. SIMLESA offered a pathway for farmers to adapt in the face of climate change and other variabilities.
Project Sites
In Malawi, SIMLESA was implemented in six districts representing two major maize-legume growing agro-ecological zones. These agro-ecological zones were the low-altitude and mid-altitude areas. The low-altitude zone represents the area of low rainfall per annum and high temperatures but very fertile soils. This zone covered the Salima district at Tembwe EPA, Balaka district at Rivirivi EPA; and parts of Ntcheu district at Nsipe EPA. The mid-altitude zone represents the area where the bulk of agricultural activities take place in Malawi. This zone covered the Lilongwe district at Mitundu Extension Planning Area (EPA), Kasungu district at Mtunthama EPA and Mchinji district at Kalulu EPA.
Despite differences in agro-ecology, all study districts are characterized by rain-fed maize-legume cropping systems. This makes them vulnerable to climate change and climate variability.
Direct beneficiaries reached through SIMLESA support : 102,856
Innovation Platforms: 10
Farmers reached: 10,375
Researchers trained 651
Adoption target: 117,641
Thematic Area | Malawi |
Area under dedicated for maize (millions) | 1.2 |
Production per ha (tonnes) | 2.6 |
Baseline reports | 1 |
Strategic Approach
Six farmers at each EPA conducted the on-farm trials where the new technologies were tested. Therefore, a total of 36 farmers pioneered on-farm trials of CASI. The on-station long term trial was mounted at Chitala Research Station.
CASI was then scaled through government agencies and the extension services system which provides a conducive environment for public private partnerships to thrive. SIMLESA used agricultural innovation platforms (AIPs) as the main organizing and planning base for scaling CASI technologies. Farmer-managed on-farm trials were established to provide an opportunity for farmers to test and choose the best intensification options. Demonstrations, field days, exchange visits and farmer field schools were used to popularize and promote adoption of intensification options among farmers. Informational materials such as leaflets, flyers, posters and brochures complemented the extension. In addition, government programmes such as the Sustainable Agricultural Production Programme (SAPP) and Agricultural Productivity Programme for Southern Africa (APPSA) were used to promote SIMLESA technologies beyond the SIMLESA impact sites. In the 2016-17 season competitive grants were provided to 2 NGOs to assist in dissemination of CASI technologies which resulted in widespread awareness of the technologies and increased adoption of the same.
Some of our field experimental sites:
Longitude 34.9362
Latitude -15.0214999999999
Longitude 34.9233800000001
Latitude -15.0348499999999
Longitude 34.9386500000001
Latitude -15.0298
Longitude 34.9274300000001
Latitude -15.03365
Longitude 34.94482
Latitude -15.00943333
Longitude 33.7323400000001
Latitude -12.9758489999999
Longitude 33.7367
Latitude -12.9809
Longitude 33.7248300000001
Latitude -12.9697169999999
Longitude 33.4312200000001
Latitude -12.5846799999999
Longitude 33.72472
Latitude -12.968897
Longitude 33.7141800000001
Latitude -12.9669299999999
Longitude 33.2037700000001
Latitude -13.5316
Longitude 33.208992231
Latitude -13.5390321309999
Longitude 33.19372
Latitude -13.53418333
Longitude 33.193427435
Latitude -13.5267861899999
Longitude 33.2040710050001
Latitude -13.2463654929999
Longitude 33.2126700000001
Latitude -13.5303166699999
Longitude 33.7993200000001
Latitude -14.21958333
Longitude 33.8064000000001
Latitude -14.20153333
Longitude 33.8165300000001
Latitude -14.21485
Longitude 33.8016500000001
Latitude -14.2136333299999
Longitude 34.69917
Latitude -14.85373333
Longitude 34.7069500000001
Latitude -14.8503499999999
Longitude 34.70707
Latitude -14.85016667
Longitude 34.70428
Latitude -14.8611166699999
Longitude 34.45698
Latitude -13.7119166699999
Longitude 34.4571700000001
Latitude -13.71168333
Longitude 34.45998
Latitude -13.71758333
Longitude 34.4631200000001
Latitude -13.7178166699999
Longitude 34.4567300000001
Latitude -13.7194499999999
Longitude 34.4571500000001
Latitude -13.71913333
Longitude 34.4563200000001
Latitude -13.7169499999999